<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crossfit Metro &#187; snatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crossfitmetro.com/tag/snatch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crossfitmetro.com</link>
	<description>CrossFit Training in Metro Atlanta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Snatches!</title>
		<link>http://crossfitmetro.com/wod/snatches/</link>
		<comments>http://crossfitmetro.com/wod/snatches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[work out of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympic lifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is Crossfit?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossfitmetro.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Increasing work capacity across broad time and modal domains Whenever the &#8220;what is CrossFit?&#8221; question comes up, the above headline is a very clear and concise definition &#8211; but you can&#8217;t stop there &#8211; you&#8217;ll be forced to elaborate, the statement serves as the perfect foundation for further discussion. What&#8217;s a great example? How about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Increasing work capacity across broad time and modal domains</h4>
<p>Whenever the &#8220;what is CrossFit?&#8221; question comes up, the above headline is a very clear and concise definition &#8211; but you can&#8217;t stop there &#8211; you&#8217;ll be forced to elaborate, the statement serves as the perfect foundation for further discussion.</p>
<p><em>What&#8217;s a great example?</em> How about one of the best examples &#8211; Snatches!</p>
<h4>WOD &#8211; Isabel</h4>
<ul>
<li>30 snatches
<ul>
<li>Men RX 135 lbs</li>
<li>Men scale 95 lbs</li>
<li>Men noob 75 lbs</li>
<li>Men beginner 45 lbs and less</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Christian&#8217;s time: 7:56 &#8211; 75 lbs</p>
<p>Christian says, &#8220;Snatches are tough. Keeping count for 30 is tough. Not counting drops is tough. &#8230;all this at only 75 pounds. Snatches are definitely the most technical of all the Olympic lifts, but the amount of <strong>work*</strong> performed is huge, thus, the amount of <strong>power**</strong> generation is also a factor.</p>
<p>* Work is defined as<br />
Work = Load x Distance</p>
<p>** Power is defined as:<br />
Power = Work(Load x Distance)/Time</p>
<p>If you can perform the <strong>same work</strong>, for more repetitions, in the <strong>same</strong> amount of <strong>time</strong>, you are said to be <strong>increasing</strong> your <strong>power</strong>. Similarily, if you can perform <strong>increased work</strong> (i.e. increased load) in <strong>less time</strong>, you are said to have <strong>increased power</strong> output.</p>
<p>This is one of the key concepts behind CrossFit and basis to functional fitness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crossfitmetro.com/wod/snatches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

